Christmas http://www.yrm.org/b-day-sun.htm and http://www.seedofabraham.net/christmas.html

December 25- Birthday of the Sun

The Christmas super-holiday is the standard for popular observances today. Families will gather on December 25, gorge themselves on ham and turkey, stare at a decorated tree while a swooning Bing provides the ambience, and exchange billions of dollars in gifts, many of them unwanted. A crescendo of months of retailer hype will climax on one grand day of thhe Savior’s supposed birth.

But hold on. Amid the bells and booze, frolicking elves and fruitcake, many sense that something isn’t right. If Christmas is a celebration of the birth of the Savior at Bethlehem, who came to bring peace on earth and good will toward men, why isn’t there more peace and good will in our world? With so many millions observing this holiday, should not our world be changing for the better? Is this not what a “religious” observance is supposed to accomplish?

Maybe the problem is simply that people fail to catch and hold the “spirit of Christmas.” Or could the holiday itself be flawed? Why do so many people sense an emptiness at this time of year, a major letdown amid the torn gift-wrapping and crushed ribbon bows?

Where’s the Scriptural Christmas?

Christmas, after all, is supposed to be rooted in the Bible. It is assumed to honor the birth of the Savior of men in a manger at Bethlehem. (Its name is a contraction for “Christ’s Mass.”) But the overblown rites of Santa Claus, tinsel, Rudolph, gift exchanging, and football mostly obscure any religious overtones of the observance.

A revealing survey would be to poll frantic Christmas shoppers to find out how many know the origins of Christmas. Do you know what Christmas is all about? Are you mildly amused each year with newspaper and magazine articles detailing the strange, irreverent customs of Christmas? On the other hand, maybe you have found these facts somewhat troubling. Isn’t it time you honestly investigated the matter? If Christmas is that significant – the biggest holiday of the year demanding a great deal of your time and money — shouldn’t you at least know what it is actually all about? This is especially serious considering the religious flavor of Christmas. The Creator in heaven may just have a definite opinion about the observance of this holiday that you need to discover.

Do you observe Christmas because you believe it is in the Bible? Try as you might, you will not find a hint of Christmas anywhere in the Scriptures. There is neither a call to observe it nor an example where anyone in the Bible did so. Shocking? Millions are oblivious to this simple fact. As one authority puts it, “There is no historical evidence that our [Savior’s] birthday was celebrated during the apostolic or early post-apostolic times,” Christmas, p. 47, The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Another writer makes this astounding statement: “The day was not one of the early feasts of the Christian church. In fact the observance of birthdays was condemned as a heathen custom repugnant to Christians,” The American Book of Days, by George W. Douglas.

What a revealing statement! The single most important religious holiday observed today in Christianity would have been FORBIDDEN in early New Testament times. Many historians and Biblical scholars corroborate this fact. Now read a candid admission from The New Catholic Encyclopedia, “Inexplicable though it seems, the date of the [Messiah’s] birth is not known. The Gospels indicate neither the day nor the month,” vol. 3, p. 656. And the Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature says, “The fathers of the first three centuries do not speak of any special observance of the nativity. No corresponding festival was presented by the Old Testament ... the day and month of the birth of [the Messiah] are nowhere stated in the Gospel history, and cannot be certainly determined,” Christmas, p. 276.

Celebrating birthdays was never sanctioned in the Scriptures, nor is a birthday party ever mentioned that didn’t end in someone’s death. If Christmas is as popular and pervasive a religious holiday as retail sales indicate, why isn’t it found anywhere in the Bible? Why aren’t we told the month —let alone the day— of  the Savior’s birth?

“But what about the manger scene with shepherds and wise men?” you ask. Yes, the manger is described in the Bible, but it was never provided as a focus for the continued observance of the birthday of the Savior. Shepherds came to the manger, but the wise men visited a house up to two years later. Here’s the account of these wise men, right from Matthew 2:11, “And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary [Miriam] his mother, and fell down and worshiped Him.” 

And then there is the timing. Usually during Christmas plays someone will read the account in Luke 2:8: “And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.” Is this describing a cold December scene? According to Jeremiah 36:22, December is wintry in the Holy Land, cold and rainy, and on occasion snow covers the ground (see Daily Life in the Time of Jesus by Henri Daniel-Rops).

Luke, however, says that sheep were still in the open fields. This had to be before the cold winter rains and snows began to fall. The livestock had not yet been moved to shelters. Notice: “It was a custom among Jews to send out their sheep to the deserts about the Passover [early spring], and bring them home at the commencement of the first rain” (Clarke’s Commentary by Adam Clarke, vol. 3, p. 370). Clarke says the first rain commences in October or November. He adds, “As these shepherds had not yet brought home their flocks, it is a presumptive argument that October had not yet commenced, and that, conse-quently, our Savior was not born on the 25th of December, when no flocks were out in the fields ...the [Bible says] flocks were still in the fields by night. On this very ground the nativity in December should be given up.”

Another indication that the Savior was born in the fall rather than in winter is the fact that Caesar Augustus had declared a census or tax be made of the empire, and each citizen had to report to his hometown to register, Luke 2:1-5. Ordering the people of the empire to travel great distances in the dead of winter would have surely incited a revolt, at least among the Jews in the Holy Land. No right-minded king would have requested such a thing. He more likely would have called a census in early fall after the crops were harvested and the people had money and time to travel before bad winter weather set in.

Various prophetic Scriptures indicate that Yahshua the Messiah was born at the time of the fall Feast of Tabernacles. That may have been one reason that the inn was full when Joseph came to Bethlehem, as the city had swelled with Feast observers.

 

Sun (Not Son) Worship           

If Christmas is not in the Bible, where did it come from? The answer is found in every encyclopedia and in many newspapers or magazines appearing around December 25. What they say about the roots of Christmas should shock every honest Bible believer into taking a serious look at the annual observance and what it really celebrates.

Historians do not hide the fact that Christmas was an invention of the Roman church, designed to compete with the heathen Roman feast of Saturnalia in honor of the sun deity Mithras. Mithras bore remarkable similarity to the Biblical Messiah. The Mithraic feast, like Christmas, was celebrated to commemorate his birth. Notice the remarkable parallels, as detailed by Joscelyn Godwin, professor at Colgate University. She writes that Mithras was “the creator and orderer of the universe, hence a manifestation of the creative Logos or Word. Seeing mankind afflicted by Ahriman, the cosmic power of darkness, he incarnated on earth. His birth on 25 December was witnessed by shepherds. After many deeds he held a last supper with his disciples and returned to heaven. At the end of the world he will come again to judge resurrected mankind and after the last battle, victorious over evil, he will lead the chosen ones through a river of fire to a blessed immortality,” Mystery Religions in the Ancient World, p. 99. Godwin remarks, “No wonder the early Christians were disturbed by a deity who bore so close a resemblance to their own, and no wonder they considered him a mockery of [the Messiah] invented by Satan.”

These two popular movements were vying for dominance in the Roman Empire – one being  pagan sun worship, the other Christian. Historian and archaeologist Ernest Renan once wrote, “If Christianity had been halted in its growth by some mortal illness, the world would have been Mithraist” (Marc Aurele, p. 597). Caught in the middle were the Roman emperors, who wanted to unify and solidify their diverse empire. They didn’t need divisive religious factions. For political reasons, the Roman rulership saw great advantage in synchronizing and harmonizing these religious beliefs into one.

So today, much of what is accepted as Bible-based tradition is the direct result of compromising and mixing with heathen religion. Roman Emperor Constantine, a former pagan himself, gave the most significant push to the Christian-pagan blending of teachings like Christmas. Among other things, he would decree that worship for Christianity switch from the seventh day Sabbath to the first day of the week – Sun-day – the day superstitious heathens worshiped the sun.

“This tendency on the part of Christians to meet Paganism half-way was very early developed,” says Alexander Hislop in The Two Babylons, p. 93. Interestingly, Hislop notes that the pagans gave up precious little of their own beliefs and practices. “And we find Tertullian, even in his day, about the year 230, bitterly lamenting the inconsistency of the disciples of [Messiah] in this respect, and contrasting it with the strict fidelity of the Pagans to their own superstition.”                                                        

Hislop quotes Tertullian, the most ancient of the Latin church fathers whose works are extant, as he decries the early church observances: “By us who are strangers to Sabbaths and new moons, and festivals, once acceptable to [Yahweh], the Saturnalia, the feasts of January, the Brumalia, and Matronalia are now frequented; gifts are carried to and fro, new year’s day presents are made with din, and sports and banquets are celebrated with uproar.”

 

Why a Death Celebration Honoring a Birth?

A mass is a celebration of the Eucharist or the emblems of the death of the Savior. Yet, “Christ-mass” is an observance supposedly in honor of His birth. Why? The answer is found with the secular ancients. Mithras was known as the Sun Deity. His birthday, Natalis solis invicti, means “birthday of the invincible sun.” It came on December 25, at the time of the winter solstice when the sun began its journey northward again. Pagan peoples were overly concerned with life and fertility. They saw life fading in the darkness of winter and so held festivals in honor of and to beckon back the sun to give life and light to the earth once more. The Dictionary of the Middle Ages explains how a funeral mass came to be celebrated as the supposed birthday of the Savior:

“In patristic thought [the Messiah] had traditionally been associated with light or the sun, and the cult of the Sol invictus, sanctioned as it was by the Roman emperors since the late third century, presented a distinct threat to Christianity. Hence, to compete with this celebration the Roman church instituted a feast for the nativity of [the Messiah], who was called the Sol iustitiae .... Usually when Christians celebrated the natalis of a saint or martyr, it was his death or heavenly nativity, but in this case natalis was assigned to be [the Messiah’s] earthly birth, in direct competition with the pagan natalis,” pp. 317-318. (That is, it was to compete with the birthday of Mithras.) So confused were some about what or whom they were worshiping that Pope Leo I (440-461) chastised Christians who on Christmas celebrated the birth of the sun deity!

The sun cult was particularly strong at Rome about the time Christmas enters the historical picture, according to the New Catholic Encyclopedia. “The Feast is first mentioned at the head of the Depositio Martyrum in the Roman Chronograph of 354. Since the Depositio was composed in 336, Christmas in Rome can be dated that far at least. It is not found, however, in the lists of Feasts given by Tertullian and Origen,” vol. 3, p. 656.

Where did Mithraism come from, this Roman religion that venerated the sun deity and influenced Christianity so greatly? Kenneth Scott Latourette in A History of Christianity, traces Mithraism to the mystery religions of Egypt, Syria, and Persia. “Almost all the mystery cults eventually made their way to Rome,” he notes. “They were secret in many of their ceremonies and their members were under oath not to reveal their esoteric rites. Numbers of them centered about a savior-god who had died and had risen again. As the cults spread within the Empire they copied from one another in the easy-going syncretism which characterized much of the religious life of that realm and age,” pp. 24-25.

 

Nimrod: The Grandfather of Paganism

Clearly, Christmas as the observance of the Savior’s birth did not come into existence immediately. It was not observed for at least three centuries after His birth. 

But Christmas as a pagan holiday traces back thousands of years to a man named Nimrod, founder of ancient pagan Babylon. Forefather to Mithras, Nimrod began a counterfeit religion in the Book of Genesis that was to compete with the True Faith of the Bible in every conceivable way down through the centuries. The Bible refers to it as the religion of Mystery Babylon — the mother of false religion that will be destroyed when the Savior Yahshua comes to set up His throne on earth, Revelation 18. Babylon’s false worship is found today in some aspect in nearly all religions, including  churchianity.

The Madonna and child theme, which is universal or evident in hundreds of religions down through the centuries, had its origin in Babylon. Nimrod’s wife was Semiramis, the first deified queen of Babylon. She is also known variously as Diana, Aphrodite, Astarte, Rhea, and Venus. Her son was Tammuz, also called Bacchus, Adonis, and Osiris. He was the supposed reincarnated Nimrod. He came back to life when the dead yule log was cast into the fire and the evergreen tree appeared as the slain king-deity reborn at the winter solstice (The Two Babylons, p. 98). The similarities with Biblical elements found among pagan religions is not simply coincidence. It is the design of the Adversary to sidetrack seekers of truth into believing they are worshiping Scripturally.

 

Saturnalia – Forerunner of Modern Christmas

Tammuz, the Babylonian sun deity, was the first counterfeit savior. Yahweh in Ezekiel 8:14-18 condemns ancient Israel for adopting worship of Tammuz, which included sun worship and the asherah (phallic symbol).

“Then he brought me to the door of the gate of Yahweh’s house which was toward the north; and behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these. And he brought me into the inner court of Yahweh’s house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of Yahweh, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of Yahweh, and their faces toward the east; and they worshiped the sun toward the east. Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here? for they have filled the land with violence, and have returned to provoke me to anger: and, lo, they put the branch [asherah] to their nose. Therefore will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them.”

Elements of this worship are still found in today’s Christmas rites. The Romans worshiped Tammuz as the sun deity Mithras in a special observance called the Saturnalia. The Saturnalia was named for Saturn, otherwise known as Cronus. Cronus is an alias for Tammuz. His wife and mother was Rhea (Semiramis). The Saturnalia, therefore, was just another observance for Tammuz, the Babylonian, counterfeit redeemer. The Romans kept the Saturnalia in December, at the time of the winter solstice, in honor of the returning sun. The festival lasted seven days. “All classes exchanged gifts, the commonest being waxed tapers and clay dolls,” says the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition.

Legend has it that the Saturnalia was instituted by Romulus under the name Brumalia (from bruma, rneaning winter solstice), Britannica, p. 232. “The pagan Saturnalia and Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to be set aside by Christian influence,” notes the New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, p. 48.

And so the church established the birthday of the Savior to coincide with the heathen feast day. “...the Latin Church, supreme in power, and infallible in judgement, placed it on the 25th of December, the very day on which the ancient Romans celebrated the feast of their goddess Bruma. Pope Julius I was the person who made this alteration” (Clarke’s Commentary).

This fact is supported by the New International Dictionary of the Christian Church, p. 223:     “December 25 was the date of the Roman pagan festival inaugurated in 274 as the birthday of the unconquered sun which at the winter solstice begins again to show an increase in light. Sometime before 336 the Church in Rome, unable to stamp out this pagan festival, spiritualized it as the Feast of the Nativity of the Sun of Righteousness.” Hislop observes, “That Christmas was originally a Pagan festival, is beyond all doubt. The time of the year, and the ceremonies with which it is still celebrated, prove its origin,” The Two Babylons, p. 93.

This blending of observances only served to confuse worshipers. By the middle of the fifth century, Pope Leo the Great rebuked his over-cautious flock for paying reverence to the Sun on the steps of St. Peter’s before turning their backs on it to worship inside the westward-facing basilica. Even some bishops, like Troy, continued to pray to the sun. He eventually went back to sun worship entirely (from The Early Church, by Henry Chadwick).

 

Protestants Object to Christmas Observance

As the Roman Empire grew and as merchants traveled, the customs of Christmas spread also. Cultures in northern Europe contributed some of their own traditions, or twists on some unbiblical themes, nearly all of which had a basis in Babylonian paganism. The decorated tree, St. Nick, yule log, wreaths, cookies, berries, mistletoe, bonfires, roast goose, roast pig, wassailing, caroling, and other familiar fixtures were added or embellished for the Christmas-Saturnalia in various countries.

When the Protestant movement attempted to rid itself of the excesses and sins of Roman Catholicism, there also came an opposition to Christmas that almost obliterated it entirely in England. “In England, for example, the Puritans could not tolerate this celebrating for which there was no biblical sanction. Consequently, the Roundhead Parliament of 1643 outlawed the feasts of Christmas, Easter, Whit-suntide, along with the saints’ daays,” Celebrations, p. 312.

For a period of 12 years the staunch Puritans kept the shackles on Christmas, making it an ordinary day of business and even a day of fasting. Yet “with the Restoration in 1660 the citizens reclaimed Christmas, but it was a different festival from what it had been. The religious aspects were often neglected, with the result that the secularization of the holiday was well under way,” ibid.

In America, strong religious antagonism to the feast of Christmas lasted from 1620 to 1750 – 130 years! In 1776 General George Washington surprise-attacked the German Hessians on December 25, winning a critical Revolutionary War battle by defeating the Christmas-celebrating, drunken German mercenaries. Obviously, Christmas was not an important celebration for the father of our country!

Henry Ward Beecher, clergyman and lecturer, wrote in 1874 of his boyhood in New England, “To me Christmas is a foreign day, and I shall die so. When I was a boy I wondered what Christmas was. I knew there was such a time, because we had an Episcopal church in our town, and I saw them dressing it with evergreens, and wondered what they were taking the woods in church for; but I got no satisfactory explanation. A little later I understood it was a Romish institution, kept up by the Romish Church.” Eventually the major Protestant denominations accepted Christmas, “although they reacted violently against the corruption of the Christkindl, the Christ Child, into ’Kriss Kringle,’ ” Celebrations, pp. 315-316.

 

Thanks for the Memories?

Can anyone who sincerely seeks to worship in purity and truth continue practicing a legacy from rank Mystery worship?

“But Christmas gives so many memories,” some may argue. “What’s so wrong with giving the children happiness and joy at this time of the year?” From a purely human standpoint, probably nothing. If Christmas existed apart from a Creator who has very clear expectations for worship, then no harm would be done to celebrate it.

Christmas, however, is a religious holiday as well as a secular observance. Its pagan rites Almighty Yahweh outright and forcefully condemns in the Scriptures. Because of that fact alone we must heed when He thunders, “Learn not the way of the heathen!” Jeremiah 10:2.  Nor is it acceptable to the Father in heaven to take only what seems to be properly religious about Christmas and downplay the pagan attributes.

Those seeking True Worship cannot mix the holy with the profane. Paul writes, 14: “Be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? 2Corinthians 6:14. We simply cannot pretend to be worshiping in truth while partaking in pagan worship rites that the Bible condemns.

      

They Worshiped Trees

Space prohibits us from detailing all of the customs of Christmas and their origins in the mystery religions of ancient peoples, but the Christmas tree deserves special note because of its prominent role. In Old Testament times an indispensable part of Baal worship involved the asherah, a sacred tree stem or pole (from which we get the May pole and totem pole). The asherah was a carryover of even more ancient tree worship. These asherah were used by the Canaanites in what the King James Version calls “groves.” Typically asherah sites included an altar and a stone pillar (a survivor of even older stone-worship).

Some historians believe asherahs were connected with phallic worship. “At first [asherah] may have been living trees (Deut. 16:21), but in later usage were wooden poles, perhaps erected to represent a tree,” Eerdman ’s Bible Dictionury, p. 93. Rather than condemn and destroy this rite of Canaanite Baal worship that they found in the Promised Land, the Israelites, as was their custom, chose instead to indulge in it. And because of that Almighty Yahweh allowed Israel to be taken into captivity and nearly destroyed. Read 2Kings 17:9-11.

The “green tree” is mentioned 13 times in Scripture and in every instance it is linked with idolatry! Can we find much difference between idolizing trees anciently and  adoration of Christmas trees today? Notice what the prophet Jeremiah wrote in connection with tree-idol worship: “Thus says Yahweh, learn not the way of the heathen ... for the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go ...” Jeremiah 10:2-5.

Although based in mystery worship, the modern Christmas tree traces to Europe. “...tree worship is well attested for all the great European families of the Aryan stock. Amongst the Celts the oak-worship of the Druids is familiar to everyone. Sacred groves were common among the ancient Germans, and tree-worship is hardly extinct among their descendants at the present day” (The Golden Bough, p. 58).

The ancients were very concerned about the dead vegetation in December and the waning of the sun. Fir trees were always green, symbolic of life, and to the ancients represented immortality in a dead world. They were often set on fire to portray and beckon back the sun, hence the modern practice of stringing trees with Christmas lights and round bulbs and balls. Ultimately, the Christmas evergreen springs from that old Babylonian, Nimrod. It represents the resurrected and reincarnated man-deity. “Now the Yule Log is the dead stock of Nimrod, deified as the sun-god, but cut down by his enemies; the Christmas tree is Nimrod redivivus – the slain god come to life again,” The Two Babylons. p. 98. He was reborn as his son Tammuz.

Yule (from huel meaning wheel) was a Germanic and Celtic sunfeast in the period December-January which became absorbed into Christmas. It commemorated the turn of the sun and the lengthening of the day.  The Christmas tree wasn’t found in America until 1821, brought by the Pennsylvania Germans. Christmas itself wasn’t recognized until 1836, when Alabama became the first state in America to make it a legal holiday.

Virtually every Christmas custom is connected with some man-made rite or heathen tradition that has little or nothing to do with the Bible or True Worship.  

      

The Right Alternative: True Bible Holy Days

In the final analysis, how could Almighty Yahweh expect His people to observe Christmas, which is so thoroughly steeped in heathen ritual? He kept the month as well as the day of the Savior’s birth hidden. The answer is obvious and clear – He never wanted it to be observed! If He did, He would have told us when and how it was to be kept, just as He did for those days He commanded in His Word.

Clearly, if Christmas were commanded in the Bible, few would be observing it — as opposed to the vast millions around the world who indulge in this ritual today. That should be proof enough that Christmas is not Scriptural. What Yahweh commands, man ignores; what He prohibits, man indulges in.

Once we are enlightened to the truth of Christmas, we find the holiday not only distasteful but totally unacceptable to Yahweh. Israel was condemned for sun worship in Ezekiel 8. Similar rites based in sun and fertility worship come alive each December 25.  

Now that you know the truth, you must make a decision. Do I continue keeping a nonBiblical observance that Yahweh condemns? Or do I start honoring the very days He commands in His Word for all True Worshipers?

His seven annual Feasts are found in Leviticus 23, the only “holidays” sanctioned in the Scriptures. These Feasts were kept by Israel, the patriarchs, the Messiah and His apostles, and will be kept worldwide in the  coming Kingdom (see Isa. 66:2-3, Ezek. 45, Zech. 14:16-18).

 The choice is yours, and so is the promise of salvation for all who obey and follow the Truth--

http://www.yrm.org/b-day-sun.htm

Second Article

http://www.seedofabraham.net/christmas.html

CHRISTMAS

 

by Richard A. Davis

edited by Avram Yehoshua

If we were to ask several people the meaning of Christmas, 80% of them would say, 'The birthday of Christ, of course.' Most of the others would say, 'The day we celebrate the birthday of Christ, since we really don't know just when He was born.' Several years ago that would have been my answer too.

About 23 years ago, just before Christmas, my family and I had returned from church and were listening to a well-known evangelist on the car radio. He was saying, 'Let's put Christ back into Christmas.' The thought appealed to me and I thought, 'Yes, let's put Christ back into Christmas.' I was surprised to hear a small Voice within me say, 'How can you put Christ back into something He was never in?!

This not only surprised me, but alarmed me as well. What was the meaning of this? I had been raised in a Christian home and all my life I had been taught that December 25th was the birthday of the Lord Jesus Christ. I had accepted that without question. Now though, I was being challenged about it. So, I set about trying to prove what I believed.

First of all, I re-read the accounts in the Scriptures concerning the birth of our Lord. I didn't immediately find anything there that told when He was born. I went next to the library to research 'Christmas'. This is what I found:

'Christmas (i.e. the Mass of Christ) was not among the earliest festivals of the Church, and before the 5th century there was no general consensus of opinion as to when it should come on the calendar, whether on January 6th, March 25th or December 25th.' (Encyclopedia Britannica)

'In Britain, December 25th was a festival long before the conversion to Christianity, for Bede relates that "the ancient peoples of the Anglo began the year on December 25th when we now celebrate the birth of the Lord; and the very night which is now so holy to us, they called the mother's night, by the reason we suspect of the ceremonies which in the night long vigil they performed.'" (Encyclopedia Britannica)

'It was according to many authorities not celebrated in the first centuries of the Christian Church, as the Christian usage in general was to celebrate the death of remarkable persons, rather than their birth' (Encyclopedia Americana)

'It is unknown just when it originated, but surely December 25th was not generally observed as the date prior to Chrysostom's time (4th century) in the Eastern Church, although much earlier in the the Western Church. There was no uniformity in the period of observing the Nativity among the early churches. Some held the festival in the month of April or May, others in January. January 6th was the usual date for the feast of the Nativity in the Eastern Church and still continues to be the date in the Armenian Church.

It is impossible to establish any date as the exact time in the year of the birth of Christ. It is often objected that December 25th cannot be the true date, for it is then the rainy season in Israel, when shepherds would hardly have been watching their flocks by night in the fields...' (The New International Encyclopedia)

This much of my research had pointed out two things. One, the encyclopedias didn't seem to have the information as to when Christ was born. And two, that December 25th didn't seem to be that time. What they did point out however, was that it was not celebrated in the first centuries of the Christian Church. And that when it began to be celebrated, the date varied among the churches. This concerned me.

A question arose. If God had wanted us to celebrate the birth of His Son, wouldn't He have made the date known to us in His Word? My studies so far had told me what it was not, now to find out the original reason for the celebration of December 25th.

WHOSE BIRTHDAY?

Further research brought more light upon the subject:

'In the 5th century, the Western Church ordered it to be celebrated forever on the day of the old Roman feast of the birth of Sol, as no certain knowledge of the day of Christ's birth existed. Among the German and Celtic tribes, the winter solstice was considered an important turning point of the year. They held their chief festival of Yule to commemorate the return of the burning wheel. The holly, mistletoe, Yule log and the wassail bowl are relics and symbolic of pre-Christian times...(Encyclopedia Americana)

'The early church was eager to replace pagan festivals by Christian ones. As Christianity spread, the feast of winter solstice, the time when the day begins to increase and light to triumph over darkness was easily turned into the feast of Christ, the light of life. Many of the great beliefs and usages of the old German and also Romans, relating to this matter, passed over from heathen practice into Christianity and have survived to the present day.' (The New International Encyclopedia)

Now I had found that since no one seemed to know just when Christ was born, Christianity had adopted someone else's birthday. Who was this Sol anyway upon which so much honor had been bestowed? And who or what was this burning wheel? Here was a 'chief festival' held in his honor and it had come down from pre-Christian times, and had survived to this present day. I had to know who this was that held so much honor.

'The early Church Fathers probably chose December 25th because the feast of the sun, or winter solstice, was a familiar Roman feast celebrating the victory of light over darkness. This idea was easily turned from a pagan to a Christian one since Christians consider Christ as the light of life.' (The World Book) 'The real birthday of Christ is unknown. In Rome it was kept on December 25th from about 330 AD onward, when to the 'birth of the unconquered sun' or winter solstice was opposed that of the 'sun of justice' (Christ); it can scarcely date from the 3rd century, for the earliest Christians did not keep birthdays.' (Collier's Encyclopedia)

Oh, there was the answer. The birth of the 'unconquered sun.' That didn't sound too good. Not only was December 25th not the birthday of our Lord, but it was the time that the ancient peoples celebrated the birth of the sun!

This opened up another study for me, that of sun-worship. Further study on the subject of sun-worship took me all the way back to ancient Babylon.

It seems that shortly after the Flood, man realized that the sun traveled southward for a certain length of time, during which time the days became shorter and shorter. Then, they noted that there was a day when a noticeable change was observed, and the 'return of the burning wheel' was celebrated. Light began once again to triumph over darkness; the sun was 'born again.' And so the 'Nativity of the Sun' became the chief winter festival.

There were several other aspects of worship involved which also included the other celestial bodies, but the sun was considered 'chief.' It was the sun that was thought to rule the heavens and the earth. It was the thing which they thought, gave them life.

THE TREE, MISTLETOE AND YULE

Then I wondered how the Christmas tree and other Christmas favorites were associated with this winter festival. The World Book, under Origin of Christmas Tree related this:

'Several scholars believe the Christmas tree began in early Rome. It appears in Germany in literature in 1604. Tree worship was common in Scandinavian countries. The Swedes and Norwegians still place a small fir tree or a branch on the ridge-pole of a newly built house for good luck. When the pagans of northern Europe became Christians, they made their sacred evergreen trees a part of the Christian festivals and decorated the trees with gilded nuts, candles (a carry-over from sun worship), and apples to stand for the stars, sun and moon.'

Opening the World Book under Yule, I read this:

'The early pagans of Scandinavian countries held Yule festivals near the end of each year. After Christianity was introduced into Europe, these festivals became Christian celebrations. The custom of burning a Yule log started in pagan times. The early Norsemen honored Thor, their god of war by burning a Yule log with great ceremony during the Yule season.'

This really didn't tell me the origin of these things. However, it did say that they were a 'carry-over from sun worship.' My studies again took me back to ancient Babylon. It was nearly 4,000 years ago that these things originated. During the winter months when vegetation died and things looked bleak, it was noted that there were some things which stayed green. Among them were the evergreen trees (the fir, palm, holly, etc.) and the mistletoe.

The mistletoe was generally found in trees that were not themselves evergreen, so it was quite noticeable. The ancient peoples thought that those things that stayed green all winter somehow had the substance of the gods in them (of which the chief was the sun). So, they began to worship these ever-green things in relation to their great Sun god. They even took new born babes and tied them to the branches of evergreen trees. If they survived the night, they were dedicated to the sun god.

As these practices came down from Babylon to Egypt, Greece and Rome, they took on different names. But the practices remained the same. December 25th was claimed to be the birthday of the chief gods from Babylon to Rome, regardless of their different names.

The names of the gods seemed to vary in accordance with the name of the person ruling the people. Each succeeding ruler of the people wanted to be deified. The original Babylonian festival started when Semiramis, the wife of Nimrod, claimed that overnight, an evergreen tree sprang up from a dead tree stump beside his grave. The dead stump supposedly symbolized her dead husband Nimrod. The new evergreen tree was Nimrod come to life again in the person of the god Tammuz.

So, the practice of burning the dead stump began and the following morning (it was said) the evergreen tree had appeared; the god had been 'born again' from the dead tree stump in the form of the evergreen tree. The stump or Yule log, represented the dead stock of Nimrod and the Christmas tree was Nimrod revived, deified as the Sun god or the 'son of the Sun.'

THE UNDECORATED TREE

By now my head was in a spin. All of this was so new to me. I had truly believed that December 25 was the birthday of the Lord Jesus Christ. To find that it wasn't really bothered me. To find that it was a carry-over from sun worship bothered me even more.

It is not an easy thing to discard from one's mind, that which had been put into it from childhood. At this point I began to justify and said, 'Oh, it doesn't really matter whether it is the birthday of Jesus or not. We are honoring Him and that's all that really counts.'

Then just before the next Christmas, I was sitting by the fire one evening reading the Bible. My wife was putting up lights around the windows and was in the process of decorating the Christmas tree. She wanted me to come and help her and got a bit upset when I didn't do so right away. She fell from the ladder and that really upset her. I checked to see if she was hurt and helped her up and then asked her to come and sit beside me. I was reading in Jeremiah 10:2-5:

'Thus says the Lord: Learn not the way of the heathen and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven. For the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the peoples are vain. For one cuts a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold. They fasten it with nails and with the hammer that it moves not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not. They must be lifted to go anywhere, because they cannot walk on their own. Be not afraid of them. For they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.'

The words just seemed to leap out at me. My wife said, 'Oh, but we are not worshiping the tree like they did then.' But the words 'Learn not the way of the heathen' began to burn themselves in my mind. And I couldn't help but see the connection between how God felt about the tree cut out of the forest and decked with gold and silver, and our Christmas tree. I began to feel uneasy about what we were doing 'for Jesus.'

The Christmas lights were not strung up that year and the tree remained undecorated. Then one day, while reading in Deuteronomy 12:29-32 I saw:

'When the Lord your God has cut off before you the nations whom you are about to enter to dispossess them, when you have dispossessed them and live in their land, take care that you are not snared into imitating them, after they have been destroyed before you. Do not inquire concerning their gods, saying, "How did these nations worship their gods? I also want to do the same." You must not do the same for the Lord your God, because every abhorrent thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods. They would even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.You must diligently observe everything that I command you. Do not add to it or take anything from it.'

These Scriptures came alive for me. I began to see how I was caught in a snare not of my own making. I was imitating the rituals for the pagan gods of Babylon and offering it to my dear Jesus.

I was worshiping Jesus the way the pagans worshiped their gods. I saw that God did not desire it. That it was not pleasing to Him.When Christmas came around again, we found ourselves not putting up the tree or exchanging presents. It was a little strange and there was a pull to participate, but we knew that it wasn't of God. I did not want to sin against Jesus.

I have found since then that there is so much anxiety attached to Christmas. Getting presents for everyone, while it seems that the whole world is doing the same thing, is no longer missed. There is such a relief, where there was so much pressure before. Not that pressure is bad, if it is from God. But we could see that Christmas pressure was not His.

SANTA CLAUS

Another thing we realized quite early that had to be discarded was Santa. Regardless of where he came from, I knew he had to go. In Deuteronomy 4:25, the Lord talks about the Children of Israel making 'a graven image' to provoke Him.

Some of the meanings of the word 'image' are, 'a mental picture of anything not actually present to the senses; a picture drawn by the imagination; a symbol.' When a man dresses to look like an imaginary figure (Santa), it's still an image.

The practice of teaching children that Santa is the judge of their behavior, giving them gifts if they're good, or withholding them if they're not, is unbiblical and a lie. We set up an image in their minds as to who is watching them. Where does God ever tell us to lie to our children, so they can feel good? And how many times have we been told and in turn tell our children, that Santa will bring them gifts?

How many times have you heard well meaning pastors proclaim from their pulpits that Jesus was born on December 25th? Or that we're doing it to honor the birth of Jesus. Where in God's Word does He tell us to honor the birth of His Son? Because if He does not tell us, then by whose authority are we as Christians proclaiming a holy day (Christmas) to ourselves and the world?

Do we have authority to create a holy day unto the Lord? And if we did, why pick a day of pagan sun-worship? I believe that if Jesus wanted us to celebrate His birthday, we would find it somewhere in the New Testament. If not, then it's sin.

When they finally come to the truth about Santa not being real, what will they think about this Jesus that you've been telling them? How can a child trust us if we lie to them? Would you really trust someone if they continually lied to you?

You might say, 'I do it for my children. Their faces are so glad. How could I take that away from them? Did you ever think that you could give them presents once a month? Out of a love for them, not associated with pagan things? Why must it be at Christmas?

Your children will give you everlasting thanks for telling them the truth and walking in it. Truth does have its reward also. It's called Life. God's Life and Light is not in illusion. Illusion may appear as light, but has no true Light in it.

STILL UNDECIDED?

When we realize that all of these practices originated in Babylon, we are reminded of another Scripture in Revelation 18:1-2, 4-5:

'And after these things I saw another angel come down from the Heavens, having great power and the earth was lit by his glory. He cried mightily with a strong voice saying, "Babylon the Great has fallen, has fallen and has become the habitation of devils..." And I heard another voice from the Heavens saying. "Come out of her My People, that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto the Heavens and God has remembered her wickedness."'

The Scriptures are referring to those same practices and customs that originated in ancient Babylon. In 1st Kings 12:33, Jeroboam, King of the northern Kingdom of Israel, ordained a feast. It was in the eighth month, even in the month that he devised in his own heart.

In 1st Kings 14:14 it states: 'And God will give Israel up because of the sins of Jeroboam, who did sin and made Israel to sin.' The golden calf that Jeroboam made was associated with sun worship. Does God change His Mind? Does He destroy a people at one point in time for doing something, and allow another people later to do it?

We have more knowledge than they did in many things. The Scriptures tell us that to whom much is given, much is required. If they could not worship God any way that they wanted to, how can we? If King Jeroboam could not ordain a feast, if he could not make a day holy that God hadn't spoken of, then how can we think that we can take a pagan day, rename it Christmas, the 'birth of Christ' and that it would be alright with God?

The early Christian Church refused these practices. But over time, these pagan practices were baptized with the name of 'Christian' and they gained acceptance. But this is nothing less than a tradition of man. And we know what Jesus had to say about those in authority teaching for the commandment of God, the traditions of men.

If God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ had wanted us to celebrate His birthday or His being born, don't you think that it would be found somewhere in the New Testament?

You might say that there is good in Christmas. But what I have seen is that Christmas time is a season where the carnal man runs around 'doing good.' If that is not the case, then why does the world get involved with Christmas? Since when does the world follow God? I'm saying that we need to get back to worshiping Jesus the way He would want to be worshiped. Christmas is man giving to God, worship He does not desire. Christmas is sin. It is an offense to our Creator and Savior. It has no biblical leg to stand on and reeks of paganism.

As you decide (hopefully) not to keep Christmas, seek the Lord for wisdom in how to relate this to others. Many are not ready for this. We need to be loving and Christ-like in sharing this truth with others. As for me and my house, we will worship the Lord...the way He chooses.


References:

The Two Babylons.................by Alexander Hislop

The Ancient Gods.........................by E.O. James

The Mother Goddess Cult..............by E.O. James

Babylon Mystery Religion...........by R. Woodrow

http://www.seedofabraham.net/christmas.html

 

Third Article—

http://www.religion-encyclopedia.com/C/christmas.htm

Christmas

Christmas. The Christian feast of Jesus' birth, celebrated on 25 DEc. Its observance is first attested in Rome in 336. Probably the date was chosen to oppose the feast of the 'birthday of the unconquered sun' on the winter solstice.

From John Bowker, ed., The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions (2000). Text © Oxford University Press.


Christmas. The word for Christmas in late Old English is Cristes Maesse, the Mass of Christ, first found in 1038, and Cristes-messe, in 1131. In Dutch it is Kerst-misse, in Latin Dies Natalis, whence comes the French Noël, and Italian Il natale; in German Weihnachtsfest, from the preceeding sacred vigil. The term Yule is of disputed origin. It is unconnected with any word meaning "wheel". The name in Anglo-Saxon was geol, feast: geola, the name of a month (cf. Icelandic iol a feast in December).

EARLY CELEBRATION

Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the Church. Irenaeus and Tertullian omit it from their lists of feasts; Origen, glancing perhaps at the discreditable imperial Natalitia, asserts (in Lev. Hom. viii in Migne, P.G., XII, 495) that in the Scriptures sinners alone, not saints, celebrate their birthday; Arnobius (VII, 32 in P.L., V, 1264) can still ridicule the "birthdays" of the gods.

Alexandria. The first evidence of the feast is from Egypt. About A.D. 200, Clement of Alexandria (Strom., I, xxi in P.G., VIII, 888) says that certain Egyptian theologians "over curiously" assign, not the year alone, but the day of Christ's birth, placing it on 25 Pachon (20 May) in the twenty-eighth year of Augustus. [Ideler (Chron., II, 397, n.) thought they did this believing that the ninth month, in which Christ was born, was the ninth of their own calendar.] Others reached the date of 24 or 25 Pharmuthi (19 or 20 April). With Clement's evidence may be mentioned the "De paschæ computus", written in 243 and falsely ascribed to Cyprian (P.L., IV, 963 sqq.), which places Christ's birth on 28 March, because on that day the material sun was created. But Lupi has shown (Zaccaria, Dissertazioni ecc. del p. A.M. Lupi, Faenza, 1785, p. 219) that there is no month in the year to which respectable authorities have not assigned Christ's birth. Clement, however, also tells us that the Basilidians celebrated the Epiphany, and with it, probably, the Nativity, on 15 or 11 Tybi (10 or 6 January). At any rate this double commemoration became popular, partly because the apparition to the shepherds was considered as one manifestation of Christ's glory, and was added to the greater manifestations celebrated on 6 January; partly because at the baptism-manifestation many codices (e.g. Codex Bezæ) wrongly give the Divine words as sou ei ho houios mou ho agapetos, ego semeron gegenneka se (Thou art my beloved Son, this day have I begotten thee) in lieu of en soi eudokesa (in thee I am well pleased), read in Luke 3:22. Abraham Ecchelensis (Labbe, II, 402) quotes the Constitutions of the Alexandrian Church for a dies Nativitatis et Epiphaniæ in Nicæan times; Epiphanius (Hær., li, ed. Dindorf, 1860, II, 483) quotes an extraordinary semi-Gnostic ceremony at Alexandria in which, on the night of 5-6 January, a cross-stamped Korê was carried in procession round a crypt, to the chant, "Today at this hour Korê gave birth to the Eternal"; John Cassian records in his "Collations" (X, 2 in P.L., XLIX, 820), written 418-427, that the Egyptian monasteries still observe the "ancient custom"; but on 29 Choiak (25 December) and 1 January, 433, Paul of Emesa preached before Cyril of Alexandria, and his sermons (see Mansi, IV, 293; appendix to Act. Conc. Eph.) show that the December celebration was then firmly established there, and calendars prove its permanence. The December feast therefore reached Egypt between 427 and 433.

Cyprus, Mesopotamia, Armenia, Asia Minor. In Cyprus, at the end of the fourth century, Epiphanius asserts against the Alogi (Hær., li, 16, 24 in P. G., XLI, 919, 931) that Christ was born on 6 January and baptized on 8 November. Ephraem Syrus (whose hymns belong to Epiphany, not to Christmas) proves that Mesopotamia still put the birth feast thirteen days after the winter solstice; i.e. 6 January; Armenia likewise ignored, and still ignores, the December festival. (Cf. Euthymius, "Pan. Dogm.", 23 in P.G., CXXX, 1175; Niceph., "Hist. Eccl,", XVIII, 53 in P.G., CXLVII, 440; Isaac, Catholicos of Armenia in eleventh or twelfth century, "Adv. Armenos", I, xii, 5 in P.G., CXXII, 1193; Neale, "Holy Eastern Church", Introd., p. 796). In Cappadocia, Gregory of Nyssa's sermons on St. Basil (who died before 1 January, 379) and the two following, preached on St. Stephen's feast (P.G., XLVI, 788; cf, 701, 721), prove that in 380 the 25th December was already celebrated there, unless, following Usener's too ingenious arguments (Religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen, Bonn, 1889, 247-250), one were to place those sermons in 383. Also, Asterius of Amaseia (fifth century) and Amphilochius of Iconium (contemporary of Basil and Gregory) show that in their dioceses both the feasts of Epiphany and Nativity were separate (P.G., XL, 337 XXXIX, 36).

Jerusalem. In 385, Silvia of Bordeaux (or Etheria, as it seems clear she should be called) was profoundly impressed by the splendid Chilhood feasts at Jerusalem. They had a definitely "Nativity" colouring; the bishop proceeded nightly to Bethlehem, returning to Jerusalem for the day celebrations. The Presentation was celebrated forty days after. But this calculation starts from 6 January, and the feast lasted during the octave of that date. (Peregr. Sylv., ed. Geyer, pp. 75 sq.) Again (p. 101) she mentions as high festivals Easter and Epiphany alone. In 385, therefore, 25 December was not observed at Jerusalem. This checks the so-called correspondence between Cyril of Jerusalem (348-386) and Pope Julius I (337-352), quoted by John of Nikiu (c. 900) to convert Armenia to 25 December (see P.L., VIII, 964 sqq.). Cyril declares that his clergy cannot, on the single feast of Birth and Baptism, make a double procession to Bethlehem and Jordan. (This later practice is here an anachronism.) He asks Julius to assign the true date of the nativity "from census documents brought by Titus to Rome"; Julius assigns 25 December. Another document (Cotelier, Patr. Apost., I, 316, ed. 1724) makes Julius write thus to Juvenal of Jerusalem (c. 425-458), adding that Gregory Nazianzen at Constantinople was being criticized for "halving" the festival. But Julius died in 352, and by 385 Cyril had made no change; indeed, Jerome, writing about 411 (in Ezech., P.L., XXV, 18), reproves Palestine for keeping Christ's birthday (when He hid Himself) on the Manifestation feast. Cosmas Indicopleustes suggests (P.G., LXXXVIII, 197) that even in the middle of the sixth century Jerusalem was peculiar in combining the two commemorations, arguing from Luke 3:23 that Christ's baptism day was the anniversary of His birthday. The commemoration, however, of David and James the Apostle on 25 December at Jerusalem accounts for the deferred feast. Usener, arguing from the "Laudatio S. Stephani" of Basil of Seleucia (c. 430. -- P.G., LXXXV, 469), thinks that Juvenal tried at least to introduce this feast, but that Cyril's greater name attracted that event to his own period.

Antioch. In Antioch, on the feast of St. Philogonius, Chrysostom preached an important sermon. The year was almost certainly 386, though Clinton gives 387, and Usener, by a long rearrangement of the saint's sermons, 388 (Religionsgeschichtl. Untersuch., pp. 227-240). But between February, 386, when Flavian ordained Chrysostom priest, and December is ample time for the preaching of all the sermons under discussion. (See Kellner, Heortologie, Freiburg, 1906, p. 97, n. 3). In view of a reaction to certain Jewish rites and feasts, Chrysostom tries to unite Antioch in celebrating Christ's birth on 25 December, part of the community having already kept it on that day for at least ten years. In the West, he says, the feast was thus kept, anothen; its introduction into Antioch he had always sought, conservatives always resisted. This time he was successful; in a crowded church he defended the new custom. It was no novelty; from Thrace to Cadiz this feast was observed -- rightly, since its miraculously rapid diffusion proved its genuineness. Besides, Zachary, who, as high-priest, entered the Temple on the Day of Atonement, received therefore announcement of John's conception in September; six months later Christ was conceived, i.e. in March, and born accordingly in December.

Finally, though never at Rome, on authority he knows that the census papers of the Holy Family are still there. [This appeal to Roman archives is as old as Justin Martyr (Apol., I, 34, 35) and Tertullian (Adv. Marc., IV, 7, 19). Julius, in the Cyriline forgeries, is said to have calculated the date from Josephus, on the same unwarranted assumptions about Zachary as did Chrysostom.] Rome, therefore, has observed 25 December long enough to allow of Chrysostom speaking at least in 388 as above (P.G., XLVIII, 752, XLIX, 351).

Constantinople. In 379 or 380 Gregory Nazianzen made himself exarchos of the new feast, i.e. its initiator, in Constantinople, where, since the death of Valens, orthodoxy was reviving. His three Homilies (see Hom. xxxviii in P.G., XXXVI) were preached on successive days (Usener, op. cit., p. 253) in the private chapel called Anastasia. On his exile in 381, the feast disappeared.

According, however, to John of Nikiu, Honorius, when he was present on a visit, arranged with Arcadius for the observation of the feast on the Roman date. Kellner puts this visit in 395; Baumstark (Oriens Chr., 1902, 441-446), between 398 and 402. The latter relies on a letter of Jacob of Edessa quoted by George of Beeltân, asserting that Christmas was brought to Constantinople by Arcadius and Chrysostom from Italy, where, "according to the histories", it had been kept from Apostolic times. Chrysostom's episcopate lasted from 398 to 402; the feast would therefore have been introduced between these dates by Chrysostom bishop, as at Antioch by Chrysostom priest. But Lübeck (Hist. Jahrbuch., XXVIII, I, 1907, pp. 109-118) proves Baumstark's evidence invalid. More important, but scarcely better accredited, is Erbes' contention (Zeitschrift f. Kirchengesch., XXVI, 1905, 20-31) that the feast was brought in by Constantine as early as 330-35.<