JOHN1onePLUS--Was Opened In
2005/6 MORE THEN ANY OTHER Page/same
this year. Sbt index.htm
Top
20-List-Open Top-Pages-Read.htm
John1.1 Any difficulty in understanding this verse is intentionally
caused by the translators –and Bible Publishers.
Most All Bible Publishers Do Not Even Print a Courtesy Foot –Note – At the
bottom of that page About The Biblical-Theology
of GOD in Jn 1:1
(Learn) The Original Manuscripts BIG G or small g-Who Are They? and What Does It Mean In Biblical-Theology
Capital G-God or Small lower case g –god –Who
Started-That? and When? and Why? GODorgod.htm
IGNORING
THIS HISIORICAL LIST OF---JOHN 1.1 –WHY? Ask Those Who Do and Show
Them This
Some Say The Truth Hurts or Hurts There Cause.
Here is a List of
Historical Bibles that The Oneness and Tri-ist Ignore.
Compare Jesus Who is I. Open and Study-DenyingJesusLife.htm
is Denying Jesus
SBT1-
The
List (1) In a beginning was
the Word, and the Word was with the God, and a god was the Word
Diaglot
1865 Diaglot NT Free Downloads For Diaglot- http://www.onlinebible.net/bibles2.html Online Now-+ Open
a god+
What Is a god. The (Open) Coptics in 200-300 A.D. understood God’s word and translated John 1:1 as"a god" back before the Nicene Creed appeared in 325AD. 200-300 A.D. Open SahidicCopticGospelofJohn.
The Coptics understood Koine Greek very well and used it every day as an Administration language Open CopticsPlus Compare Homoousion/Theology=The word that made Jesus God-Open Homoousion & Jn1-1AndTheRansomSacrifice.Open SonOfGod-and-God’SonVerses-Vs-GodTheSon-Verses.htm-- Open GodtheSon.htm John 1 NSB and Others (52 THRU 56) Online Now in Open B2.htm or BnTOBibles-An Early Coptic Translation and John 1:1c-a god(2)
Harwood, 1768, "and was himself a divine person"
(3) Newcome, 1808, "and the word was a god"
(4) Thompson, 1829, "the Logos was a god
(5) Goodspeed, 1939, "the Word was divine
(6) Torrey, 1947, "the Word was god
(7) New English, 1961, "what God was,the Word
was"
(8) Moffatt, 1972, "the Logos was divine
(9) Reijnier Rooleeuw, 1694, "and the Word was a
god"
(10) Simple English Bible, "and the Message was
Deity"
(11) Hermann Heinfetter, 1863, [A]s a god the Command
was"
(12) Abner Kneeland, 1822, "The Word was a
God"
(13) Robert Young, 1885, (Concise Commentary)
"[A]nd a God (i.e. a Divine Being) was the Word"
(14) Leicester Ambrose, 1879, "And the logos was
a god"
(15) Charles A.L. Totten, 1900, "the Word was
Deistic [=The Word was Godly]
(16) J.N. Jannaris, 1901, [A]nd was a god"
(17) George William Horner, 1911, [A]nd (a) God was
the word"
(18) Ernest Findlay Scott, 1932, "[A]nd the Word
was of divine nature"
(19) ames L. Tomanec, 1958, [T]he Word was a
God"
(20) Philip Harner, 1974, "The Word had the same
nature as God"
(21) Maximilian Zerwich S.J./Mary Grosvenor, 1974,
"The Word was divine"
(22) Siegfried Schulz, 1975, "And a god (or, of
a divine kind) was the Word"
(23) Translator's NT, 1973, "The Word was with
God and shared his nature
(24) Barclay, 1976, "the nature of the Word was
the same as the nature of God"
(25) Schneider, 1978, "and godlike sort was the
Logos
(26) Schonfield, 1985, "the Word was divine
(27) Revised English, 1989, "what God was, the
Word was
(28) Cotton Parch Version, 1970, and the Idea and God
were One
(29) Scholar's Version, 1993, "The Divine word
and wisdom was there with God, and it was what God was
(30) Madsen, 1994, "the Word was <EM>a
divine Being"
(31) Becker, 1979, "ein Gott war das Logos"
[a God/god was the Logos/logos]
(32) Stage, 1907, "Das Wort war selbst gttlichen
Wesens" [The Word/word was itself a divine Being/being].
(33) Bhmer, 1910, "Es war fest mit Gott
verbunden, ja selbst gttlichen Wesens" [It was strongly linked to God, yes
itself divine Being/being]
(34) Thimme, 1919, "Gott von Art war das
Wort" [God of Kind/kind was the Word/word]
(35) Baumgarten et al, 1920, "Gott (von Art) war
der Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]
(36) Holzmann, 1926, "ein Gott war der
Gedanke" [a God/god was the Thought/thought]
(37) Rittenlmeyer, 1938, "selbst ein Gott war das
Wort" [itself a God/god was the Word/word]
(38) Lyder Brun (Norw. professor of NT theology),
1945, "Ordet var av guddomsart" [the Word was of divine kind]
(39) Pfaefflin, 1949, "war von gttlicher Wucht
[was of divine Kind/kind]
(40) Albrecht, 1957, "gttlichen Wesen hatte das
Wort" [godlike Being/being had the Word/word]
(41) Smit, 1960, "verdensordet var et
guddommelig vesen" [the word of the world was a divine being]
(42) Menge, 1961, "Gott (= gttlichen Wesens) war
das Wort"[God(=godlike Being/being) was the Word/word)
(43) Haenchen, 1980, "Gott (von Art) war der
Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]
(44) Die Bibel in heutigem Deutsch, 1982, "r war
bei Gott und in allem Gott gleich"[He was with God and in all like God]
(45) Haenchen (tr. By R. Funk), 1984, "divine
(of the category divinity)was the Logos"
(46) Schultz, 1987, "ein Gott (oder: Gott von
Art) war das Wort" [a God/god (or: God/god of Kind/kind) was the
Word/word].
(47) William Temple, Archbishop of York, 1933, "And the Word was
divine."
(48) John Crellius, Latin form of German, 1631, "The Word of Speech was a
God"
(49) Greek Orthodox /Arabic translation, 1983, "the word was with
Allah[God] and the word was a god"
(50) Ervin Edward Stringfellow (Prof. of NT Language and Literature/Drake
University, 1943, "And the Word was Divine"
(51) Robert Harvey, D.D., 1931 "and the Logos was divine (a divine
being)----
The Real Strong’s Numbers are in GODSupreme.
The Real SupremeGod,ID-The
Purpose of this page is to EXPOSE the Real
Strong’s Numbers 2316- θεός Compared
To
Those that mislead people by Printing Thayer’s
Dictionary Words
Inplace of
Strong’s Numbers
(1) Open T/O ‘s -EX-(2) ThayersOTGOD- EX- (3) TDNT/-BBDP Compare IFCS.
King James Bible with
Strong's Numbers
Then saith
Jesus unto
him Get thee hence
Satan for
it is written Thou shalt worship
the Lord thy God and
him
only shalt
thou serve—open GODSupreme.
Reading This makes no mystery out of Biblical-Theology.
52 THRU 57 Open Online Open B2.
Compare This Very Important Study.
The Fact is Jesus never
said He was God—(He said He was God’s Son)—So on that Bases any other verse
that may seem to
Imply that Jesus is God has to be perceived that Jesus is God’s
Spokesman in some sense or another—It is that Simple.
Or Jesus Lied when He said-I. (The First Implied Lie and what about Jn 1:1?-Open Imply)
SBT1-
The Simple BibleTruth
Fact that the word was with GOD shows two separate distinct
personal pro nouns and god
Small case or a god was the Word-Is Correct for the Second
Real Person in John1.1 (Jesus) that was begotten
in
verse 18-and become flesh in verse 14-if not
all the below Bible Publishers would have not done so. Study WhatIsagod.htm
Many Bible
Publishers Printed a-god or a-God---Long Before Colwell’s
Birth-Study- 5.htm
Open a.htm &Example1Jn1-1.htmOpen AllManuscriptsWereWrittenInAllCaps.htm GODorgod.htm
The main question that is not brought to peoples attention is did Jesus
Lie about His Personal Individuality.
Regardless How Jn 1:1 Reads-GODorgod.htm -Jesus never said He was God.
He always spoke of Himself as a Personal Pro-Noun and that He has a Personal God and Father who sent Him to earth.
The Fact is Jesus never
said He was God—(He said He was God’s Son)—So on that Bases any other verse
that may seem to
Imply that Jesus is God has to be perceived that Jesus is
God’s Spokesman in some sense or
another—It is that Simple.
Or Jesus Lied when He said-I. (The First Implied Lie and what about Jn 1:1?-Open Imply)
The only one that would benefit Jesus being God is Satan—because if you believe
Jesus is God
Then you will worship Him
and Jesus SAID to Worship the Father only Study -The KingJesusHasSPOKEN.htm . And
The many meanings of Worship are in PROSKUNEO.htm--Worshipping any thing other
the Father will is idolatrous and will get
You Thrown in the same
Return-Compare The False EVIL Side OF The TRINITY
in Study-1A.htm-to get you done away with –Open and
Study and the below- Rev -21:8
And
any or all the the commentaries on idolaters and he second death."
Full for article Open and Study
Open Jesus Who is
I. DenyingJesusLife.htm
is DenyingJesus.htm
SatanO&Jesus.htm
Prov8-22 In the past, commentators and translators who held to
the Trinity/Oneness and No Jesus before Mary doctrines argued that qa·nah´
should here be rendered “possessed.” Qa·nah´ can convey the sense of
either “acquire (possess)” or “produce.” (Gen. 4:1; Deut. 32:6; Ps. 139:13;
Neh. 5:16) But scholars acknowledge that the context here points to the
rendering “produced” or “created,” since verses 24 and 25 speak of
Wisdom as being “brought forth “ This rendering is borne
out by the Greek Septuagint, the Syriac Peshitta Version
and the Targums. So now even translations by Trinitarians, such as the Catholic
Jerusalem Bible, use the rendering “produced” or “created.”
For more about this open Prov8-22.htm
There are two Types of
Christian Bibles Open-BiblesTwoTypes.htm and B2.S Bibles.
Who Do Bible Publishers
Serve?
Who is their accounting to?
Who Certifies and endorses their work?
Open BiblePublishersAccountableToWho.htm
All Trinity/Oneness
Bibles Contradict Themselves!!!
All Trinity/Oneness
Nicene Creeds Bias Bible Translations Testify in Rev 1:1 That Jn 1:1
Is Contradictory to it
inTheology. And This Is Only
One Main Example!!! What about The ALPHAandTheOMEGA.htm
JOHN1onePLUS.htm IS The Bible Lawyer (Superficial Pubic defender) and Examiner
Of This Verse---and
You are The Jury—Of ThePeoplesCourt.htm
28+ Pages + Links and Growing ----God’s Word is Great and Perfect and can not
be Contradictive or Something is Wrong !!
The People’s Court on Theology.htm The Expository
Library index.htm Study Jn1-1-1Tim3-16-1Jn5-7.htm
The
Trinitarian/Oneness Movement Tells People That God Is Mysterious and
Incomprehensible
God Is Not Mysterious and
Incomprehensible-----The Following Verses weren’t written for nothing.
Open -MysteryVersesPlusMore.htm
The Trinitarian/Oneness Movement would like you to
believe they that these verses do not exist.
God Reveals Mysteries He doesn’t cause them --the Nicene Creeds caused the Jesus/Jehovah mystery AFact.htm.
Compare id=140001239
The
Trinity
Relevant Bible
Teaching-This is a mental mystery The
Trinity
Compare Oneness.htm
Delusion2Thess8-12.htm in IntroductionForConcernedStudents.htm
And Myths.htm
Study Jn1-1-1Tim3-16-1Jn5-7.htm
The only
logical explanation for Printing Bibles with (The Word Was God ) and the Word
was a god is -- a different spirit.
1 Cor 11:4 - [In Context] GODorgod.htm
Joh
Joh
Joh
and they will listen to my voice.
So there will be one flock and one shepherd.
Joh
Joh
and I have the authority to take it back again. This is a command that
I have received from my Father."
Joh
Joh
Joh
Joh
Joh
and no one can snatch it from the Father's hand.
Study John
Other Verses to
consider Matt 28:1-20 - Study Chapter
28:1 - [In Context]--Matt 28:16 - [ In Context |
John