Baptism 2001 Commentary plus others 3 2 2011 Baptism. Found below are all the primary scriptures that discuss baptism and its purpose, followed by some conclusions that are clearly indicated by these texts:

Ancient Types

While the act of baptism as such isn't found in the Ancient Scriptures of Israel, it was indicated in type by the Israelites coming through the Red Sea. For, Paul wrote at 1 Corinthians 10:1, 2, 'All of our ancestors were under the cloud and they all passed through the sea, so they were all baptized into Moses (because of the cloud and the sea).'

We also find baptism implied at Ezekiel 36:25-27, where we read, 'Then upon you I'll pour out clean water, and from your uncleanness you will be cleansed. I'll also cleanse you of idols, and put in you a new heart. I'll put in you a new spirit, and remove hearts of stone from your flesh... I'll give you a heart made of flesh. Then I'll put My Breath inside you, and make it so you will follow My rules. Then My decisions you will keep, and you will observe them all.'

John's Baptism

Matthew 3:11 (John the Baptist said), 'Indeed, I baptize you in water [to show your] repentance.'

Luke 3:3, 'So, he (John the Baptist) went through all the country around the Jordan preaching a baptism of repentance for forgiveness of sins.'

Mark 1:4, 'John was in the desert; and he came baptizing, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. And virtually all those in Judea and from Jerusalem went out to be baptized by him in the Jordan River, as they openly confessed their sins.'

Acts 18:24, 25, 'Now, a Jew named Apollos (a native of Alexandria), an excellent speaker who knew the scriptures well, arrived at Ephesus. He had been taught the ways of the Lord and was aglow with the Breath [of God]. What he said and taught about Jesus was correct, but he only knew about the baptism of John.

Baptism in Jesus

Acts 8:14-17, 'When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria was starting to accept the word of God, they sent Peter and John there. They went [to the Samaritans] and prayed for them to receive the Holy Breath, because it hadn't come to any of them yet, although they had been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. But when [Peter and John] laid their hands on them, then they started to receive Holy Breath.'

Acts 19:1-7, 'When he got to Ephesus, he found some disciples, and he asked them, Did you receive the Holy Breath [of God] when you became believers? And they answered: Why, we've never even heard whether there is Holy Breath. So he asked, Then, what were you baptized in? And they said, In John's baptism. So, Paul told them: When John baptized, it was a baptism of repentance. However, he told the people to believe in the one coming after him… that is, in Jesus. When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. And when Paul laid his hands on them, the Holy Breath [of God] came over them. Then they started speaking in different languages and prophesying.'

Who Were Baptized

Acts 2:41, 'Then, those who welcomed his words were baptized, and about three thousand people were added that day.'

Acts 8:12, 'And many men and women were baptized.'

Acts 16: 15, 'And as she and her household were being baptized, she begged…'

Acts 16:32, 'Then, he and his entire family were baptized right away.'

When They were Baptized

Acts 8:36-38, 'And the eunuch said, Look! Here's some water. What's to prevent me from getting baptized? So, he commanded the chariot [driver] to stop. Then Philip and the eunuch went down to the water, and he baptized him.'

Acts 10:45-47, 'At this, all the faithful ones who were there with Peter (since they were all circumcised) were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Breath was also being poured out on people of the nations. [They recognized that this was true], because they heard them speaking in different languages, glorifying God. Then Peter asked, Can anyone forbid water to baptize these who have received the Holy Breath, the same as we have?'

Acts 18:8, 'And many of the Corinthians who heard also started believing and got baptized.'

Why They were Baptized

Acts 2:38, 'Then Peter told them: Repent, and each of you get baptized in the name of Jesus the Anointed One, so your sins can be forgiven, and then you'll receive the gift of the Holy Breath.'

Acts 22:16, 'So now, why are you wasting time? Get up, get baptized, and wash your sins away by calling on his name.'

Romans 6:3-5, 'Don't you realize that all who were baptized into the Anointed Jesus were also baptized into his death? So, we were buried along with him by our baptism into his death. And just as the Anointed One was raised from the dead to the glory of the Father, we will likewise follow [him into] a new way of life. Now, if we've been buried with him in the same type of death, then we will also be resurrected.

1 Corinthians 12:13, 'By the one Breath we were all baptized into one body, regardless of whether we are Jews or Greeks, slaves or free. And we were all made to drink from that one Breath.'

Galatians 3:27-29, 'All who were baptized into the Anointed One have put on the Anointed One. So, there aren't any Jews or Greeks, slaves or freemen, males or females, because you're all one in the Anointed One, Jesus. And if you are [part] of the Anointed One, you are really the seed of Abraham and heirs of the promise.'

Colossians 2:12, 'You were all buried with him when [you were] baptized, and you were all raised together by faith in what God (who raised him from the dead) has done in you.'

1 Peter 3:21, '[What that chest pictured] is now saving you too. It's Baptism. [The purpose of this baptism] isn't to get rid of fleshly filth; it's to ask God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Jesus the Anointed One.'

John 3:5, 'Jesus replied, I tell you the truth, unless someone is born from water and [God's] Breath, he can't enter the Kingdom of God.'


John's baptism symbolized repentance over past sins. It was a way of calling people's sins to their attention and telling them to repent, to prepare their hearts for the coming of the Anointed One.

Jesus' baptism wasn't just for repentance for past sins. After the Anointed One came, people were to be baptized in his name.

All those were baptized who recognized the truth of the words of Jesus and his Apostles. However, they had to be old enough to recognize the truth.

They were baptized when they started believing and when God's Breath was seen in their lives.

They were baptized:

1.     To show that they had repented and to allow for their past sins to be forgiven (Acts 2:38, 22:16, Romans 6:3-5)

2.     To show that they have agreed to follow a new way of life (Romans 6:3-5)

3.     To ask God for a good conscience (1 Peter 3:21).

4.     To receive the gift of the Holy Breath (Acts 2:38, 8:14-17)

5.     To accept that they may also have to share in Jesus' death (Romans 6:3-5, Colossians 2:12)

6.     To be resurrected in God's Kingdom (Romans 6:3-5, John 3:5)

7.     To become part of the Anointed One's 'body' (1 Corinthians 12:13, Galatians 3:27-29).

It is noteworthy that baptism appears to indicate at least one's desire to be a ruler in God's Kingdom. And being 'born again' by God's Holy Breath indicates acceptance or being 'chosen' by God and being given the value of a 'spiritual' life.

It also seems that baptism is closely linked symbolically to the anointing (with oil) that many of the ancient kings of Israel received, since receiving God's Holy Breath is involved. Notice the parallel that Jesus himself drew at Acts 1:5 'Because, although John baptized with water, in just a few days you will be baptized in [God's] Holy Breath.'

Is receiving God's Holy Breath part of the purpose of the baptism of all Christians? Yes, because all Christians need and can receive this blessing. So, when one is baptized in water, he or she is indicating a willingness to make the needed changes in his/her life in order to qualify for being 'chosen' by God. And receiving a 'baptism in God's Holy Breath' then, seems to be an indication of acceptance of that individual by God.

Note that there are no scriptures teaching that baptism is done to symbolize simple 'dedication' of one's life to serving God. In fact, the Greek word dedication isn't found anywhere in the Christian Era Scriptures. The concept of dedication (but not the word) may be found in the Greek word paratitherthoran (put aside for yourselves), which is translated herein as dedicate at 1 Peter 4:19. But, notice how the term is applied there: 'So, let those who (by God's will) are suffering dedicate themselves to the faithful Creator by doing whatever is good.'

As you can see, this scripture isn't talking about baptism, since Peter was addressing Christians who were already baptized. His point was that those to whom he was writing needed to change their way of life (after baptism, not before) and rededicate it to God by doing good things.

As you can see, this scripture isn't talking about baptism, since Peter was addressing Christians who were already baptized. His point was that those to whom he was writing needed to change their way of life (after baptism, not before) and rededicate it to God by doing good things.

So, the implication of all the above, is that baptism symbolizes that a person has repented (turned away from their past life's course), and in so doing, he or she has been forgiven by God. Or, as 1 Peter 3:21 says; they have asked God for a 'good conscience.' They are also asking God for a measure of His Holy Breath. In addition, the action symbolizes the person's making himself or herself available to be part of the God's Kingdom government, and by so doing, they are also demonstrating a willingness to suffer a violent death, as did Jesus, if necessary.

 Baptism to Show Repentance for Sins

As you can see from the words of Acts 2:38, 22:16, and Romans 6:3-5; part of the reason for getting baptized is to admit that we are sinners and in need of God's forgiveness. So, baptism is a visible act of recognition, showing that we are sorry for our past ways and that we want God to cover over our transgressions. That baptism is in fact done for this purpose is reaffirmed by Jesus' parting words, as found at Luke 24:47, where he said, 'Then, in (my) name, [the message of] repentance for forgiveness of sins is to be preached in all the nations, starting from JeruSalem."

Infant Baptism

What Paul wrote at Romans 6:5 ('If we've been buried with him in the same type of death, then we will also be resurrected') has long been misinterpreted as meaning that no one will be resurrected unless he/she is baptized first, and this misunderstanding has led people to baptize (actually just sprinkle) newborn infants, in the irrational belief that this act will result in their resurrection should they die prematurely.

Was Paul actually saying that baptism is required for one to be resurrected? No, for he had earlier said (as recorded at Acts 24:15), 'And I have this hope in God, which they (the Pharisees) also share, that there's going to be a resurrection of the righteous and the unrighteous.' Therefore, we must conclude that many will be resurrected (including ALL who are righteous) who were never baptized. So, what did Paul actually mean by what he wrote at Romans 6:5?

As with most misinterpretations of scriptures, the problem is caused by taking words out of context. Notice the point that Paul was trying to make to those Roman Christians in the previous verses (Romans 6:2-4): 'Since we've died to sin, how can we live in it any longer? Don't you realize that all who were baptized into the Anointed Jesus were also baptized into his death? So, we were buried together into him by our baptism into death. And just as the Anointed One was raised from the dead to the glory of the Father, we should be walking in a new way of life.'

You can see from the context that Paul was discussing much more than the need to baptize babies so they can be resurrected. He was really telling adult Christians to leave their sinful ways behind, because, by their baptism into the death of Jesus, they should have become dead to their past (sinful) way of life, and that they should thereafter 'be walking in a new way of life!' And if they did that (leave their sinful ways behind), they were assured a resurrection. So, he wasn't saying that baptism would ensure a resurrection; he was saying that being righteous was the requirement!

Of course, babies, infants, and children cannot be determined to be either righteous or unrighteous, since inexperience and living under the direction of their parents results in their not being able to establish a life's course of righteousness or unrighteousness… and they certainly have 'no old way of life' to leave behind. However, as Paul pointed out at Acts 24:15, all (except the willfully wicked) are ensured a resurrection.

Yet, notice that minor children and even unbelieving mates are considered 'holy' by God when one is a faithful believer. For, Paul wrote (at 1 Corinthians 7:14), 'Because, the wife makes [her] unbelieving husband holy, and the brother makes [his] unbelieving wife holy… otherwise, their children would be unclean; but now they are holy.' So, the children of faithful Christians are considered holy before God without the need for baptism.

Sprinkling or Total Immersion?

'Baptize' is a Greek word that means 'to dip.' We can clearly see the difference dipping and sprinkling in the scripture found at Mark 7:3, 4, which says: 'None of the Pharisees or any of the Judeans eat unless they vigorously wash their hands (gr. nipsontai tas keiras), because they follow the traditions of the elders. Nor do they eat anything they bring from the market unless they sprinkle (gr. rantisitontai) it first. And they observe many other traditions that have been passed down, such as washing (gr. baptismous – 'dipping') cups, pitchers, and copper pots in water.'

So as you can see, there is no similarity between the Greek words that are rendered 'sprinkle' and 'baptize' (or dip). And when the Bible instructs us to be 'baptized,' it means to be totally covered with water, which is a proper symbol of dying to a former course of life.

Baptism Into the Kingdom

Notice that Jesus said (as recorded at John 3:5), 'Unless someone is born from water and [God's] Breath, he can't enter the Kingdom of God.' Doesn't this mean that one must be baptized and receive God 's Breath or Spirit in order to be resurrected and enter 'the Kingdom of God?'

Well, remember that Paul said there would be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous. So, entering the Kingdom of God must mean something more that just being resurrected.

Recognize that Jesus was also emphasizing the need for people to live righteous lives in order for them to enter the Kingdom of God. And he again spoke of this (as recorded at Matthew 25:34), where those he said that the sheep will be told, 'Come, you who've been praised by my Father; Inherit the Kingdom that's been prepared for you since the founding of the arrangement.' As you can see from this text, entering the Kingdom seems to equate to inheriting the Kingdom, which is an elevated position that is promised to the sheep and the righteous. However, Jesus wasn't saying that those who don't receive this reward wouldn't be resurrected. For more information, see the linked document God's Promise of an Inheritance.

Baptism for the Dead?

One scripture that many Bibles render in an illogical way is 1 Corinthians 15:29. It says in Greek, 'Epei ti poiesousin oi baptizomenoi hyper ton nekron ei holos nekroi ouk egeirontai ti kai baptizontai hyper auton?' Which is literally translated as, 'Since what will do those being baptized on the dead, if all the dead not are raised, why also are baptized on them?'

From the wording of the above scripture, one religious group has concluded that they must be baptized for the sake of their ancestors (their dead) and others. Yet, this concept contradicts the other scriptures and makes absolutely no sense. What purpose does the resurrection into God's Kingdom serve if it can be given to any type of person (whether righteous or unrighteous) as a gift from someone else? Isn't resurrection to be a 'king and priest' the reward that is promised for one's developing a special and personal relationship with God?

Notice how another Bible (NW) renders this verse, 'Otherwise, what will they do who are being baptized for the purpose of [being] dead ones? If the dead are not to be raised up at all, why are they also being baptized for the purpose of [being] dead ones?'

Although this wording, which makes the point that baptism is for the purpose of dying (not for the dead) is quite convoluted, its meaning may be supported by the text. The reason for this is that the Greek word hyper (which means on) can also be translated, for the purpose of. And our research has led us to a similar conclusion.

What was Paul talking about at 1 Corinthians 15:29? The answer appears to have been provided for us at Colossians 2:12, where Paul again wrote, 'You were all buried with him when [you were] baptized.'

So, note; He was saying that baptism symbolizes a person's willingness to share in the suffering and death of Jesus. And it appears as though a word was lost through the centuries of Bible copying (not an uncommon occurrence), and the verse at 1 Corinthians 15:29 should actually read: 'So, what good does it do for them to be baptized into his (Jesus') death?'


Many religions require that once a person 'learns the truth' as they currently see it, they must then be re-baptized if they had been baptized before, to become part of their religion, church, or group. As the result, some who have been baptized more than once, often say that they were baptized into this church and that. However, what does baptism have to do with a particular dogma, creed, or joining a religion? Isn't baptism a personal agreement with God? And isn't baptism into a religion something that is done for a wrong purpose… putting religious doctrine and group identity ahead of a relationship with Jesus?

'However,' some might ask, 'shouldn't we have a full knowledge of truth before we are baptized?' That doesn't seem to have been a requirement for early Christians. And if it was a requirement, then we would all have to be re-baptized each time we come to a better understanding about a Bible teaching.

Notice from the accounts quoted above, that baptism was performed at the beginning of one's accepting the hope and upon their agreeing to make a change in their lives. Cornelius and his household, the Ethiopian Eunuch, and all others were baptized within hours of accepting the good news; so can we say that they knew the whole truth and could pass the tests that some religions require today? Surely not, but the Apostles and disciples baptized them anyhow… on the spot.

It has been argued though that those who were baptized so quickly didn't have that much to learn, since they were already familiar with the Bible's teachings. But if that were true, then what of Cornelius who wasn't a Jew but a gentile army officer… and the gentile jailer and his family that Paul preached to? Surely many religions have come to wrong conclusions on this, because their instructions and requirements don't align with what was actually practiced by First-Century Christians.

Notice that the Bible says people were to be baptized so their sins could be forgiven, to gain a good conscience, and to show that they wished to follow a new way of life. So, if any person has ever been baptized for those reasons, is there any just cause or need for rebaptism? If such an agreement has already been seriously and sincerely made with God, then what does changing one's thoughts about what the Bible says on some teachings have to do with it, for we should always be constantly learning and changing our minds as the result of Bible study.

However, many religions require rebaptism to show that you now agree with them, and that you now choose to be one of them… so it's baptism into them not into Jesus. So, if you have already made an agreement to serve God and change your life, we would question why any action would be required other than fulfilling the vow that you've already made.

We recently heard a story of an old woman who couldn't join a particular group and 'be saved' unless she was baptized. And because she lived an incredibly long way from the nearest members of that group, she asked an itinerant preacher to baptize her (in 1923). Then in her early 90s, when her mind was disabled with Alzheimer's, she was told that her baptism had never been valid and that she never had a relationship with God, so she had to be re-baptized by a member of the religion that she had been a member of through all those years… think about that. Were they right?

Baptism into the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit?

The words found at Matthew 28:19, 'in the name of the Father, the Son, and [God's] Holy Breath,' are not found in the ancient Shem Tob Hebrew manuscript, so they may be spurious (words that were added to the Bible). So, did Jesus really command that we be baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit?

Many churches use a variation of the baptismal formula found at Matthew 28:19 which reads, 'Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit.' This has been called the Trinity Formula, since it contains the three-person Godhead.

At present we don't have any complete manuscripts of Matthew prior to the 4th Century, and all existing manuscripts written thereafter contain this phrase. However, there is evidence that this reading is a later corruption of the original text.

The early Church historian Eusebius appears to quote from a different manuscript than any we presently have. Eighteen times between the years 300 and 336-C.E. he cited Matthew 28:19, 20 as: 'Go ye and make disciples of all the nations in my name, teaching them to observe all things, whatsoever I commanded you.'

It is interesting that the traditional Trinitarian reading of Matthew 28:19 does not appear in Eusebius' writings until after the Council of Nicaea, wherein the Trinity began to formally held as official doctrine. So, evidence strongly indicates that this is a spurious scripture inserted by later Trinitarians, in the same vein as 1 John 5:7-8.

This finding may prove to cut both ways for some, for while it breaks apart the only mention of the Trinity trio, it does seem to prove what many Trinitarians have said all along, that baptisms should only be done in the name of Jesus.

To return to your Bible reading, click on the browser Back button

Home Page

So what should the Baptizer say to the Baptism person before immerging that person under water and being that person back up from under the water?

JWs Baptism goes like this—2 question

(1) On the basis of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, have you repented of your sins and dedicated yourself to Jehovah to do his will?

(2) Do you understand that your dedication and baptism identify you as one of Jehovah's Witnesses in association with God's spirit-directed organization?

(The Watchtower, April 1st 2006, pages 21-25)

Good question for a JW expert open 33.htm and allexperts.

Compare these answers

·                Validity of JW Baptism - Jehovahs-Witness.Net

These are the two questions that are asked of Jehovah's Witness 'baptismal .... Neither are JWs saved as the new baptismal questions reflect, ...

·        Baptism Questions?? - Jehovahs-Witness.Net - Similarto Baptism Questions?? - Jehovahs-Witness.Net

I remember one guy BOMBED out on the baptism questions with this ... for baptism inside of this cult and still have to undergo a 2 question final exam to pass. .... In the past the JW's accpted a Baptisim if ithad been done bu full ...

[ More results from ]

·                0 tags Anonymous asked: How is someone baptized

How is someone baptized as a JWs? As in what is said at the ... Here are the two questions that the JW must answer in order to be baptized: June 1, 1985 (p.

·                The Jehovah's Witnesses Practice of Baptism - Similarto The Jehovah's Witnesses Practice of Baptism

1 - Before baptism, one must answer over 80 questions to the satisfaction of local Kingdom Hall ... This book can be viewed online at: organized.pdf). 2 - Baptism never tends to be something that is ever rushed into.

·                Do jehovah witnesses baptize in the name of the father, the ...

2 is critically important to the JWs because they equate obedient support ... Edit: Sasi gave the actual questions asked before Baptism and it is ...

·                Jehovah`s Witness: baptism, baptism question, condescending ...

May 24, 2012 ... baptism question, condescending attitude, religious discrimination: Nice to see ... my Question: To what Legal Organization do all Baptized JWs belong to. ... 2) Both parties have the right to decide whether or not you remain ...

·        Jehovah`s Witness: baptism, baptism question, ...

May 16, 2012 ... baptism question, kingdom halls, slanderous remarks: It s not slander it s a fact. ... I will turn elsewhere, as most JWs have to when they have questions. ... I respectfully ask: 2: To what Corporation or Organization am I under ...

[ More results from ]

·                Jehovah`s Witness: baptism - required to be saved?, baptism ...

Jun 26, 2008 ... JWs do not have a specific formula for baptism, more like a procedure. ... Just before a person is baptized they are asked two questions to ...




   Edit HTML code

August 26, 2006




   Edit HTML code

Jun 30 02:27pm




   Edit HTML code

September 21, 2008




   Edit HTML code

July 16, 2009




   Edit HTML code

August 31, 2008




   Edit HTML code

August 26, 2006